|
Post by endorbr on Nov 1, 2019 21:55:55 GMT
What I want to know is why after about the second thing he did no one was curb stomping his ass? Gen Z is a bigger wet blanket pussy generation than the Millennials.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 6, 2019 3:20:02 GMT
Emma Watson says she's 'self-partnered' not single Well maybe if she wasn’t a raving feminist but she wouldn’t be “self-partnered.” Talk about delusional. She’s admitting without admitting that she’s basically a failure at life. She’s turning 30 and basically has nothing to show for it.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 6, 2019 12:04:53 GMT
Emma Watson says she's 'self-partnered' not single Well maybe if she wasn’t a raving feminist but she wouldn’t be “self-partnered.” Talk about delusional. She’s admitting without admitting that she’s basically a failure at life. She’s turning 30 and basically has nothing to show for it. That really the saddest form of pride. Basically, she's an incel.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 6, 2019 20:20:53 GMT
A 22-year-old Instagram influencer says kids should learn less about World War II in school because 'it's so intense' "[World War II] needs to be taught in moderation to promote mental health and focus on teaching young people real life skills," he said. "And to prepare for current issues that are relevant to us such as how to get a mortgage, what are the real impact of Brexit and climate change for future generation!" Stupid fuck wants schools to talk less about an important historical event that shaped the modern world in favor of talking about current SJW talking points like Brexit and climate change because it might create "mental health issues." Someone needs to take this poofty fluffer out back and beat his ass.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 7, 2019 12:33:11 GMT
A 22-year-old Instagram influencer says kids should learn less about World War II in school because 'it's so intense' "[World War II] needs to be taught in moderation to promote mental health and focus on teaching young people real life skills," he said. "And to prepare for current issues that are relevant to us such as how to get a mortgage, what are the real impact of Brexit and climate change for future generation!" Stupid fuck wants schools to talk less about an important historical event that shaped the modern world in favor of talking about current SJW talking points like Brexit and climate change because it might create "mental health issues." Someone needs to take this poofty fluffer out back and beat his ass. Brexit will have an economic impact but, if they'd just get on with it, everything would balance out eventually. Some growing pains, but ultimately everything would be all right. The climate is probably fucked and our children will inherit a world full of extreme temperatures, famine, and powerful weather events. Your mortgage won't matter much when the revolution happens, but you know what might help you survive that? Study the system-wide wars of the past. I loathe idiots that think they can just 'reimagine' the past or assign present cultural values to past events. Shit happened before. It is to your betterment to understand that shit so that you might know how to avoid that shit when the cycle restarts because, like pretty much everything in the universe, that shit be round and the same ol shit be coming around. Foo'
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 7, 2019 13:18:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 7, 2019 16:46:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 7, 2019 18:03:04 GMT
I don't wanna click it. I guess the reason why is how they've ruled in the past? Unless the reason is "this dude got physically and gaily fucked by Brett and Sammie at a college frat party in a dormroom bathroom" I don't see a reason for a recusal.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 7, 2019 18:34:13 GMT
I don't wanna click it. I guess the reason why is how they've ruled in the past? Unless the reason is "this dude got physically and gaily fucked by Brett and Sammie at a college frat party in a dormroom bathroom" I don't see a reason for a recusal. It's not even how they've ruled in the past. It's because they are seen as conservative. And because they took a photograph with a guy that this dude believes to be anti-LGBT because he's pro-traditional marriage.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 7, 2019 18:50:56 GMT
I don't wanna click it. I guess the reason why is how they've ruled in the past? Unless the reason is "this dude got physically and gaily fucked by Brett and Sammie at a college frat party in a dormroom bathroom" I don't see a reason for a recusal. It's not even how they've ruled in the past. It's because they are seen as conservative. And because they took a photograph with a guy that this dude believes to be anti-LGBT because he's pro-traditional marriage. None of that matters in any legal sense. Will they rule against him? Well, yeah... most likely. Most likely this dude ain't got a legal leg to stand on. They're conservatives, not boogymen. They are guided by principles that this guy clearly DEVIATES from. Trying to get them to recuse themselves isn't going to help your case, Queerio, you'd do far better by appearing before them and making a reasoned argument that you're normal in every way except for where you wanna shove your bits. Make an argument that they can't deny, that's how you win court cases.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 7, 2019 18:55:03 GMT
It's not even how they've ruled in the past. It's because they are seen as conservative. And because they took a photograph with a guy that this dude believes to be anti-LGBT because he's pro-traditional marriage. None of that matters in any legal sense. Will they rule against him? Well, yeah... most likely. Most likely this dude ain't got a legal leg to stand on. They're conservatives, not boogymen. They are guided by principles that this guy clearly DEVIATES from. Trying to get them to recuse themselves isn't going to help your case, Queerio, you'd do far better by appearing before them and making a reasoned argument that you're normal in every way except for where you wanna shove your bits. Make an argument that they can't deny, that's how you win court cases. Considering whatever the cases come up are likely to be it will probably just be LGBT people trying to force hetero people to bake them cakes or shave their genitals or something so I don't think there's much of a reasoned argument to be made that wouldn't be a violation of people's constitutional rights.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 7, 2019 19:30:46 GMT
None of that matters in any legal sense. Will they rule against him? Well, yeah... most likely. Most likely this dude ain't got a legal leg to stand on. They're conservatives, not boogymen. They are guided by principles that this guy clearly DEVIATES from. Trying to get them to recuse themselves isn't going to help your case, Queerio, you'd do far better by appearing before them and making a reasoned argument that you're normal in every way except for where you wanna shove your bits. Make an argument that they can't deny, that's how you win court cases. Considering whatever the cases come up are likely to be it will probably just be LGBT people trying to force hetero people to b ake them cakes or shave their genitals or something so I don't think there's much of a reasoned argument to be made that wouldn't be a violation of people's constitutional rights. God, I wish you were exaggerating.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 7, 2019 19:32:12 GMT
Considering whatever the cases come up are likely to be it will probably just be LGBT people trying to force hetero people to b ake them cakes or shave their genitals or something so I don't think there's much of a reasoned argument to be made that wouldn't be a violation of people's constitutional rights. God, I wish you were exaggerating. Welcome to life in [current year].
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 11, 2019 13:27:46 GMT
Fucking Hell. Why does anyone pay to send their kids to college anymore? Damn these kids are dumb.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 11, 2019 15:22:56 GMT
To those defending this woman, so when she poisons a bunch of people because of improper food safety what then? What's the recourse? You think anyone is going to be able to hold this unlicensed vendor liable? What about the recourse for all of the other vendors who are lawfully registered? Should they get to stop following safety regulations and paying licensing fees because of people like this? Do you think this woman is reporting her profits for income taxes? She should be paying her fair share like everyone else, right?
The police look nothing but professional in the video. There was no beat down or harassment presented. This woman has been repeatedly told that she can't operate as an unlicensed vendor in that same location. The only people being harassed in the video are the police officers, by the woman filming the video, for just doing their job.
|
|