|
Post by endorbr on Nov 11, 2017 19:33:33 GMT
Rebel Wilson opens up about sexual harassment by 'a male star' Oh look. More #METOO. I seriously don't believe her, and not because she's overweight, unattractive and obnoxious. She names no names (which is a red flag), she doesn't say when (another flag), and she magically got away without anything happening in both supposed instances. But OH she's told so many people about it and warned them off of these people, right? But for some reason the details are all hush hush now that she's publicly telling this story? Go tell it to someone who cares Rebel.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 12, 2017 8:27:24 GMT
So the Hollywood Sex Harassment Scandal thing is continuing to go on, adding new people each day. Added to the list of creeps: the guy from Gossip Girl (never watched it, no idea who he is) and the guy who played the skeezy dude in Prison Break. Also, comedian Louis CK has been accused by several women, and has actually come forward and admitted it's true. Apparently he's a member of the 'corners women in a room and masturbates in front of them' club. Not too familiar with the dude's comedy, but I wonder if his set has a 'So I was jerking off in front of a woman...' bit. So, what, they have meetings every Tuesday and Thursday at the Applebees?
|
|
|
Post by Katzenbalger on Nov 12, 2017 13:31:19 GMT
So, what, they have meetings every Tuesday and Thursday at the Applebees? Heh, y'know I wouldn't be surprised. There's got to be some sort of link. I guess it's like hunters getting together and bragging about what animals they've killed - Hollywood executives and actors get together to brag about who they've masturbated in front of.
|
|
|
Post by Katzenbalger on Nov 12, 2017 13:34:17 GMT
Rebel Wilson opens up about sexual harassment by 'a male star' Oh look. More #METOO. I seriously don't believe her, and not because she's overweight, unattractive and obnoxious. She names no names (which is a red flag), she doesn't say when (another flag), and she magically got away without anything happening in both supposed instances. But OH she's told so many people about it and warned them off of these people, right? But for some reason the details are all hush hush now that she's publicly telling this story? Go tell it to someone who cares Rebel. Oh, this is worse than outright naming somebody. Because she's kept it vague, that puts every director/actor she's worked with under the 'sexual harasser' umbrella in the public eye, which means the media and twitter are already on their way to start assuming away. Last I heard, people are assuming it's Sacha Baron Cohen.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 12, 2017 14:37:17 GMT
Oh, this is worse than outright naming somebody. Because she's kept it vague, that puts every director/actor she's worked with under the 'sexual harasser' umbrella in the public eye, which means the media and twitter are already on their way to start assuming away. Last I heard, people are assuming it's Sacha Baron Cohen. I just don't know how all this is gonna end. Have you seen the video of Adam Sandler 'harassing' some nameless actress during an interview by putting his hand on her knee while responding to a question? If that counts then I see no future for human interaction. We just all need to divide up into boys and girls, like in kindergarten, and just mail each other bodily fluids when we wanna procreate.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 12, 2017 14:38:44 GMT
When the fuck did knees become something sexy to the average person? Beyond being on them I see nothing appealing at all. I guess shaking hands will be harassment soon.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 13, 2017 20:24:05 GMT
Weeds star Elizabeth Perkins holds sign naming actor James Woods as she joins hundreds of women in stand against sexual abuse at the #MeToo Survivors march in Hollywood Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5076273/Elizabeth-Perkins-joins-MeToo-march-Hollywood.html#ixzz4yLP6qZN1 Follow us: @mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Now the real agenda at work with this #METOO movement starts to rear its ugly head here: "I've been sexually assaulted multiple times throughout my life,' said marcher Tara McNamarra, 21, of Los Angeles. 'It's affected me in every aspect of my life.'" Say what? Multiple times with her implication being in the context of the article that it was from different people. If its really instances that occurred with more than multiple people you're talking about then maybe at some point you need to examine your behavior or what you think your definition of sexual assault means. Especially considering she's only 21. If she was abused by her parents or family members that's one thing (which isn't stated so its deliberately leaving it vague) but WTF universe is she living in where by age 21 she's been sexually assaulted by multiple people outside that... oh wait, wait. She lives in California. Got it now. "Producer Schulman, who presides over the advocacy group Women in Film, told the crowd that the sexual harassment problem can't be fixed by just weeding out sex criminals. Women, she said, have to be protected from prejudice and abuse. Schulman called for diversifying workplaces and reforming human resources departments. " So... then she's saying women should be considered both equal and a protected class with rights that men don't have? Because that is sure as Hell what that sounds like. "...diversifying workplaces and reforming human resources departments." sounds an awful lot like poorly concealed code for replacing qualified men in jobs with women regardless of their qualifications under the guise of combatting sexism and the patriarchy. This article also perfectly showcases the media tactic of taking up close crowd shots to make them appear larger than they really are. You can't get a perspective on the honest crowd size because its all taken at street level from five feet away. Looking at those pics the crowd was clearly pretty thin, meaning this movement has nowhere near the support the media desparatly wants us to believe. Also, Elizabeth Perkins isn't exactly an unbiased source to go bad mouthing James Woods. They clearly don't like each other and regularly feud on Twitter over social issues, particularly gender, sexism, etc. So her writing his name is about as revealing of something as me telling you water is wet. It's completely expected. Amber Tamblyn seriously thinks posting a pic she had of a text conversation with a friend who supposedly corroborates her story of Woods' hitting on her 20 years ago is evidence of anything. Hearsay lady, 20 years too late hearsay at that. These people really need to get some new schtick. This crap is old and smelly already and that band wagon lost a wheel back on the trail about 20 miles ago.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 14, 2017 12:49:14 GMT
True Story: Had a woman show up in the lobby yesterday. Been married 9 years. Filing for divorce. Wanted to report 9 years of domestic and sexual abuse. So, for the ENTIRETY of your marriage you NEVER had consensual sex?
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 14, 2017 13:41:35 GMT
True Story: Had a woman show up in the lobby yesterday. Been married 9 years. Filing for divorce. Wanted to report 9 years of domestic and sexual abuse. So, for the ENTIRETY of your marriage you NEVER had consensual sex? I know a guy whose ex wife charged him with rape 5 years after it happened.He believes she did it because she wanted more money and assets from the divorce settlement. He said he did have sex with her after she said ''no'' 5 years prior,but she kept living with him for years after it happened...
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 14, 2017 14:03:09 GMT
True Story: Had a woman show up in the lobby yesterday. Been married 9 years. Filing for divorce. Wanted to report 9 years of domestic and sexual abuse. So, for the ENTIRETY of your marriage you NEVER had consensual sex? I know a guy whose ex wife charged him with rape 5 years after it happened.He believes she did it because she wanted more money and assets from the divorce settlement. He said he did have sex with her after she said ''no'' 5 years prior,but she kept living with him for years after it happened... If she's saying no then that's not cool, even if she did let it slide, but charging him with it does seem like a tactic. My fear is what is already happening; where sexual assault is being redefined as simply pursuing someone and hitting on them or asking for sex
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 14, 2017 14:19:26 GMT
This is purportedly evidence of the LAPD 'planting' drugs on a hit-and-run arrest. In the video you can see the officer stoop, pick up a small packet of white powder, and place it in the suspect's wallet. Because this portion of the bodycam video happened 30 seconds before he pushed record (body cams automatically do this; something the officers would well know) the defense attorney says this is evidence they framed his client.
My question is how did it get on the ground? Are illicit drugs SO prevalent in CA that all a cop needs to do is just pick some up off the ground in order to plant evidence?
The officers say that the item had fallen from the wallet when they opened it and the officer simply recovered and replaced it.
So, quiz time: Which scenarios is more logical? A: The LAPD planted random drugs found on the ground in a black man's wallet? or B: The very reason why this man didn't hang around after hitting someone is that he had drugs on his person so he fled and when the officer opened his wallet this baggie fell out?
You decide.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 14, 2017 14:21:29 GMT
Also worthy to note the card and cellphone laying on the ground too.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 14, 2017 14:30:33 GMT
I know a guy whose ex wife charged him with rape 5 years after it happened.He believes she did it because she wanted more money and assets from the divorce settlement. He said he did have sex with her after she said ''no'' 5 years prior,but she kept living with him for years after it happened... If she's saying no then that's not cool, even if she did let it slide, but charging him with it does seem like a tactic. My fear is what is already happening; where sexual assault is being redefined as simply pursuing someone and hitting on them or asking for sex I dunno. Maybe she said no at first,but afterwards she became aroused. Quite often,the woman says no at first,but the men still forces himself on her,she becomes aroused,then it's not rape,and then she will even want to go a second time.Some women say they think once a woman consents to having sex,then it shouldn't be rape,even if she said no at first,but started enjoying it after. Especially when couple is in the middle of having sex and the woman will say ''I've had enough,I'm tired'', when the guy is near climaxing,and the guy will continue on with it. And sometimes I've told my girlfriends I'm not in the mood,but they will force themselves upon me until I'm aroused.i know it's different because a man is stronger than a woman,but I think if the claim of rape is against a husband,and she continues living with him for years and continues having sex with him years after the 'rape incident' took place,I think there's extenuating circumstances . But I'm totally against a guy breaking into a woman's house and raping her,or slipping a drug into her drink and raping her.The law should go down heavy on those guys.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 14, 2017 16:00:29 GMT
This is purportedly evidence of the LAPD 'planting' drugs on a hit-and-run arrest. In the video you can see the officer stoop, pick up a small packet of white powder, and place it in the suspect's wallet. Because this portion of the bodycam video happened 30 seconds before he pushed record (body cams automatically do this; something the officers would well know) the defense attorney says this is evidence they framed his client.
My question is how did it get on the ground? Are illicit drugs SO prevalent in CA that all a cop needs to do is just pick some up off the ground in order to plant evidence?
The officers say that the item had fallen from the wallet when they opened it and the officer simply recovered and replaced it.
So, quiz time: Which scenarios is more logical? A: The LAPD planted random drugs found on the ground in a black man's wallet? or B: The very reason why this man didn't hang around after hitting someone is that he had drugs on his person so he fled and when the officer opened his wallet this baggie fell out?
You decide.Number two is clearly the most logical likelihood. But this guys ambulance chaser lawyer will probably get him off on the technicality of the body cam since it casts "doubt."
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 14, 2017 16:58:59 GMT
lol I'm sorry guys. I couldn't help it. I posted this at Fuse. If he knows where we are you can be sure he's on his way.
|
|