|
Post by endorbr on Sept 16, 2019 4:03:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Sept 16, 2019 7:23:45 GMT
This is what gets me; we argue all the time about the ethics of genetic modification and cloning. We have the technology to regrow fucking organs that cannot be rejected and we bicker about stem cells. We have the ability to modify a baby's genome so that it won't get an awful hereditary sickness and we whinge about designer babies. We can bring Mammoths back from the goddamn dead but here's some rube worrying that we should. And yet there is a doctor in practice, ostensibly disgustingly wealthy and living in a gated community with a secret HDD full of kiddie porn hidden in his spare bedroom air vent, making money hand over fist by helping people in their GODDAMN SEVENTIES have children? Children that will NEVER remember their parents because they died before they were FOUR of OLD AGE?? "The doctor who handled the pregnancy is insisting he was tricked into believing that the mom was in her 60s." SO FUCKING WHAT???
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Sept 16, 2019 17:05:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Sept 20, 2019 7:56:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Oct 20, 2019 12:44:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Oct 20, 2019 13:26:04 GMT
Met countless women who like bad boys , who will use her for sex and just have a casual relationship with her. Even if she has a boyfriend/is married. Many women I've met like a financially stable guy to take care of her, but have fun with the bad boy.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Oct 20, 2019 13:42:01 GMT
Met countless women who like bad boys , who will use her for sex and just have a casual relationship with her. Even if she has a boyfriend/is married. Many women I've met like a financially stable guy to take care of her, but have fun with the bad boy. Yeah this. You know, as a student (and fan) of Anthropology, I realize that the natural order of humanity, for the last 200k plus years until recently, is for the young males to leave their group and seek out a new one. It's common all over the animal kingdom, not just primates. So it makes sense that a woman will select for these males; it increases gene variance and makes for strong babies. While the "financially stable" males are the local, known males; men that the women know will be around and will protect them and their offspring, the "bad boy" roaming males are just genetically attractive. Modern women see them as dangerous and exciting or sometimes don't even know why they are attracted to "bad boys" but it's really most likely subconscious.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Oct 20, 2019 14:09:41 GMT
Met countless women who like bad boys , who will use her for sex and just have a casual relationship with her. Even if she has a boyfriend/is married. Many women I've met like a financially stable guy to take care of her, but have fun with the bad boy. Yeah this. You know, as a student (and fan) of Anthropology, I realize that the natural order of humanity, for the last 200k plus years until recently, is for the young males to leave their group and seek out a new one. It's common all over the animal kingdom, not just primates. So it makes sense that a woman will select for these males; it increases gene variance and makes for strong babies. While the "financially stable" males are the local, known males; men that the women know will be around and will protect them and their offspring, the "bad boy" roaming males are just genetically attractive. Modern women see them as dangerous and exciting or sometimes don't even know why they are attracted to "bad boys" but it's really most likely subconscious. Yep. It's pretty much like in the animal kingdom. The stronger male will fight off the other males and take the female/s for himself or will force himself onto a female (call it rape or mating or whatever). From personal experience, a Filipina lady I spent time with told me she loves her Korean bf, but he has a small dick, and she was excited by trying with white or half white guys such as me... A Thai lady I spent time with told me her husband took good care of her financially, but her husband didn't do much in bed with her, he was more focused on player computer game, she told me she wanted to be raped...
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Oct 20, 2019 14:41:57 GMT
Yeah this. You know, as a student (and fan) of Anthropology, I realize that the natural order of humanity, for the last 200k plus years until recently, is for the young males to leave their group and seek out a new one. It's common all over the animal kingdom, not just primates. So it makes sense that a woman will select for these males; it increases gene variance and makes for strong babies. While the "financially stable" males are the local, known males; men that the women know will be around and will protect them and their offspring, the "bad boy" roaming males are just genetically attractive. Modern women see them as dangerous and exciting or sometimes don't even know why they are attracted to "bad boys" but it's really most likely subconscious. Yep. It's pretty much like in the animal kingdom. The stronger male will fight off the other males and take the female/s for himself or will force himself onto a female (call it rape or mating or whatever). From personal experience, a Filipina lady I spent time with told me she loves her Korean bf, but he has a small dick, and she was excited by trying with white or half white guys such as me... A Thai lady I spent time with told me her husband took good care of her financially, but her husband didn't do much in bed with her, he was more focused on player computer game, she told me she wanted to be raped... Like, I'm guessing, most American males I have a LOT of reservations when it comes to rape play. There's just SO much that can go wrong here. In our present culture you could, conceivably, go along with this perfectly consensual experience only to have it bite you in the ass when break-up time arrives. This is why I personally avoided it and my advice to anyone else is to avoid it or, at the minimum, never take pictures, never write anything down, and deny, deny, deny. (Thanks Chick McGee)
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Oct 28, 2019 15:02:10 GMT
Texas, it seems, is fast-becoming the new Florida. You know, I have nothing against homosexuals. Never have. That's what you wanna do with your junk, fine. For you gay guys, that means two-less competitors for female attention. For you lesbians, either you weren't on my radar or I STILL don't mind because hot girls making out is still exciting.... But... (you saw it coming) Maybe, and I'm not saying it's fact, but just maybe the normalization of homosexual relationships is the direct precursor to stories like this. In that first story... raping boys with foreign objects as a means of initiation (by other boys) is becoming frighteningly common. Maybe that fucked up shit happened when I was young, I don't know. I avoided team sports like the plague due to bullies anyway. But I have a hard time believing that it did because the label "faggot" was so horrible, so life-ending, that I knew it was bad before I knew what it meant. You didn't even sit next to your friend in the gorram MOVIE THEATER for fear of such a label. You didn't even slap a guy's ass with a "good game," until it became so common on televised football as to be ubiquitous. Maybe homophobia is the cure for shit like this? Just saying.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Oct 28, 2019 16:00:45 GMT
Texas, it seems, is fast-becoming the new Florida. You know, I have nothing against homosexuals. Never have. That's what you wanna do with your junk, fine. For you gay guys, that means two-less competitors for female attention. For you lesbians, either you weren't on my radar or I STILL don't mind because hot girls making out is still exciting.... But... (you saw it coming) Maybe, and I'm not saying it's fact, but just maybe the normalization of homosexual relationships is the direct precursor to stories like this. In that first story... raping boys with foreign objects as a means of initiation (by other boys) is becoming frighteningly common. Maybe that fucked up shit happened when I was young, I don't know. I avoided team sports like the plague due to bullies anyway. But I have a hard time believing that it did because the label "faggot" was so horrible, so life-ending, that I knew it was bad before I knew what it meant. You didn't even sit next to your friend in the gorram MOVIE THEATER for fear of such a label. You didn't even slap a guy's ass with a "good game," until it became so common on televised football as to be ubiquitous. Maybe homophobia is the cure for shit like this? Just saying. Talk about trying to impugn the guys character as a dodge for her questionable behavior. So Jezebel's premise is that I'm supposed to believe that this guy lied about virtually every aspect of his life, according to his ex. So if he "lied" about all these details then how did she find all this stuff out? She's saying he lied about being previously married twice, lied about being in the military and being discharged because he claimed to be homosexual, lied about how much money he makes, lied about his job experience, lied about attending college and earning a PhD. Funny that I don't see anything saying that her assertions about all his supposed lies were actually confirmed, only that she had their marriage annulled on that basis. The kicker, how is ANY of that important (even if true) as to whether or not this woman is inflicting mental, physical, and emotional harm onto their child? Jezebel's entire premise again is based on the idiotic idea that a 3 year old boy can really determine that he's a girl. Instead of doing what a normal parent would do and set their kid straight on any gender confusion her response was to start calling him a girl, put him in dresses, paint his nails, and demand that everyone else play along. Well let me just say that immediately puts her sanity in question for me and calls into question all of her assertions against her ex-husbands supposed behavior.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Oct 28, 2019 16:11:58 GMT
Texas, it seems, is fast-becoming the new Florida. You know, I have nothing against homosexuals. Never have. That's what you wanna do with your junk, fine. For you gay guys, that means two-less competitors for female attention. For you lesbians, either you weren't on my radar or I STILL don't mind because hot girls making out is still exciting.... But... (you saw it coming) Maybe, and I'm not saying it's fact, but just maybe the normalization of homosexual relationships is the direct precursor to stories like this. In that first story... raping boys with foreign objects as a means of initiation (by other boys) is becoming frighteningly common. Maybe that fucked up shit happened when I was young, I don't know. I avoided team sports like the plague due to bullies anyway. But I have a hard time believing that it did because the label "faggot" was so horrible, so life-ending, that I knew it was bad before I knew what it meant. You didn't even sit next to your friend in the gorram MOVIE THEATER for fear of such a label. You didn't even slap a guy's ass with a "good game," until it became so common on televised football as to be ubiquitous. Maybe homophobia is the cure for shit like this? Just saying. Talk about trying to impugn the guys character as a dodge for her questionable behavior. So Jezebel's premise is that I'm supposed to believe that this guy lied about virtually every aspect of his life, according to his ex. So if he "lied" about all these details then how did she find all this stuff out? She's saying he lied about being previously married twice, lied about being in the military and being discharged because he claimed to be homosexual, lied about how much money he makes, lied about his job experience, lied about attending college and earning a PhD. Funny that I don't see anything saying that her assertions about all his supposed lies were actually confirmed, only that she had their marriage annulled on that basis. The kicker, how is ANY of that important (even if true) as to whether or not this woman is inflicting mental, physical, and emotional harm onto their child? Jezebel's entire premise again is based on the idiotic idea that a 3 year old boy can really determine that he's a girl. Instead of doing what a normal parent would do and set their kid straight on any gender confusion her response was to start calling him a girl, put him in dresses, paint his nails, and demand that everyone else play along. Well let me just say that immediately puts her sanity in question for me and calls into question all of her assertions against her ex-husbands supposed behavior. lol clearly we focused on different elements! I didn't even touch that insanity.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Oct 28, 2019 17:00:20 GMT
Talk about trying to impugn the guys character as a dodge for her questionable behavior. So Jezebel's premise is that I'm supposed to believe that this guy lied about virtually every aspect of his life, according to his ex. So if he "lied" about all these details then how did she find all this stuff out? She's saying he lied about being previously married twice, lied about being in the military and being discharged because he claimed to be homosexual, lied about how much money he makes, lied about his job experience, lied about attending college and earning a PhD. Funny that I don't see anything saying that her assertions about all his supposed lies were actually confirmed, only that she had their marriage annulled on that basis. The kicker, how is ANY of that important (even if true) as to whether or not this woman is inflicting mental, physical, and emotional harm onto their child? Jezebel's entire premise again is based on the idiotic idea that a 3 year old boy can really determine that he's a girl. Instead of doing what a normal parent would do and set their kid straight on any gender confusion her response was to start calling him a girl, put him in dresses, paint his nails, and demand that everyone else play along. Well let me just say that immediately puts her sanity in question for me and calls into question all of her assertions against her ex-husbands supposed behavior. lol clearly we focused on different elements! I didn't even touch that insanity. James Younger: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know Yeah my take away: That bitch be crazy. Jezebel's claims are all based upon he said she said. "The appeals court concluded that “the evidence supports the trial court’s findings supporting conclusions that Younger committed fraud by inducing Georgulas into marriage. Younger denied Georgulas’s allegations, and in some cases testified to the contrary. However, the trial court is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses, and it was permitted to believe Georgulas’s testimony and reject Younger’s testimony…. The trial court did not err in rendering a judgment annulling the marriage.” That statement right there says it all. The trial court just decided that what she was saying was true despite any real evidence and only her word versus his. Never mind again that ALL of that is irrelevant to whether or not she's trying to force her male child into being a girl. But clearly he is the evil one here because he wants to take a wait and see approach rather than forcing his kid to wear dresses and be referred to as a girl. I don't trust that mom for a second. I know her type. She set the hairs on the back of my neck to standing just with the hiding behind her credentials. What does being a certified pediatrician have to do with whether or not she is subjecting her own child to abuse? "I'm a doctor." isn't an answer to anything here. Her PhD means shit to me here. I know lots of PhDs and plenty of them are not only complete assholes but batshit crazy too. Even crazy belligerent know-it-all assholes can complete accredited programs and otherwise seem like normal functioning people.
|
|