|
Post by endorbr on Nov 1, 2017 13:49:20 GMT
Mueller got Manafort’s attorney to speak against him once. He may try the tactic again. Well this sets a troubling precedent. So in order to try and get that impeachment the Left so desperately wants we're just going to start ignoring attorney client privilege and the 5th Amendment now are we? They're trying to say the belief is that the client lied to the attorney. So if they pursue this line of thinking and it turns out that it doesn't pan out and they can't prove the client was lying are there any repercussions for that? Because this seems like some shady lawyer/judge shit to me. If we're just going to ignore legal precedent, policy, procedure and law to go after convictions then why would anyone ever cooperate with the judicial system?
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 1, 2017 14:46:12 GMT
Mueller got Manafort’s attorney to speak against him once. He may try the tactic again. Well this sets a troubling precedent. So in order to try and get that impeachment the Left so desperately wants we're just going to start ignoring attorney client privilege and the 5th Amendment now are we? They're trying to say the belief is that the client lied to the attorney. So if they pursue this line of thinking and it turns out that it doesn't pan out and they can't prove the client was lying are there any repercussions for that? Because this seems like some shady lawyer/judge shit to me. If we're just going to ignore legal precedent, policy, procedure and law to go after convictions then why would anyone ever cooperate with the judicial system? I'm not down with traitor attorneys or a violation of attorney/client privilege but really this is a LOT less about a witchhunt by the left and a lot MORE about some pretty treasonous activity by a bunch of shady ass globalists who have zero loyalty to country in their personal pursuits. We need to snip this Russia shit in the bud. They pretty much rule the internet now while we've had our attention on global economies and corporate smokescreens. It's time for the Nation State to return to the fore and for us to wake the fuck up and see what while we've allowed ourselves to be seduced by corporations and social media while a former KGB strongman has been rebuilding the might and power of the Soviet Union and stands poised to have the last laugh.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 1, 2017 14:51:51 GMT
Mueller got Manafort’s attorney to speak against him once. He may try the tactic again. Well this sets a troubling precedent. So in order to try and get that impeachment the Left so desperately wants we're just going to start ignoring attorney client privilege and the 5th Amendment now are we? They're trying to say the belief is that the client lied to the attorney. So if they pursue this line of thinking and it turns out that it doesn't pan out and they can't prove the client was lying are there any repercussions for that? Because this seems like some shady lawyer/judge shit to me. If we're just going to ignore legal precedent, policy, procedure and law to go after convictions then why would anyone ever cooperate with the judicial system? I'm not down with traitor attorneys or a violation of attorney/client privilege but really this is a LOT less about a witchhunt by the left and a lot MORE about some pretty treasonous activity by a bunch of shady ass globalists who have zero loyalty to country in their personal pursuits. We need to snip this Russia shit in the bud. They pretty much rule the internet now while we've had our attention on global economies and corporate smokescreens. It's time for the Nation State to return to the fore and for us to wake the fuck up and see what while we've allowed ourselves to be seduced by corporations and social media while a former KGB strongman has been rebuilding the might and power of the Soviet Union and stands poised to have the last laugh. Oh for sure. This Russia Russia Russia BS is getting super old. It's Russia everything now. It's like McCarthy screaming about COMMIES!!! everywhere. And while we're wasting time on internal political squabbling and trying to de-legitimize our government because half the population hates the guy in office a very real threat is gaining power on that end of the world and laughing the whole time about how we're waffling around about the boogeyman he managed to plant in everyone's ear.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 1, 2017 17:16:10 GMT
This is kind of political I guess... it concerns the minimum wage argument. So... whatever I'm posting it here. I've been having a round and round with some folks on the Internet about a video that was honestly about why restaurant profit margins are so low. They are trying to say its all just conservative propaganda and a thinly veiled attempt to say that increasing minimum wage to $15 an hour would negatively impact businesses. So the video states that the reason profit margins are low in the restaurant business are competition, predominantly amongst independently owned small businesses, as well as government mandated minimum wages coupled with the diminishing returns created by increases in menu prices among other factors. Then we get all these people in the comments trying to say competition isn't real because changes impact all restaurants the same... which is like a serious WTF statement. How can you be that dumb? People trying to say that doubling the minimum wage wouldn't impact a business bottom line. Again HUH? That the business can just raise prices to compensate. Never mind that you can only increase prices so much before your customers stop coming. Then I get a guy trying to say the reason why their profit margin is so low is franchise fees. Say what? So... then what about all those restaurants that aren't franchises? He says there are millions of restaurants in the US. Quick Google search showed that the number of restaurants in the US as of 2016 was actually only 620,000. And that of those millions 90% are franchised. Google again showed that of the 620,000 only 218,000 are franchises, approximately 35%. So what we really have is this guys perceptions of what he thinks is the problem despite overwhelming statistical proof that says the opposite. He says he got his 90% figure from McDonalds. Well yeah IDIOT 90% of McDonalds stores are probably franchise. That's their business model. FACEPALM. This guy says if employees are responsible for 10% of my costs (statistically restaurants show payroll costs account for 33% of every dollar they earn) then he could just raise prices 10% to compensate (for a doubling of the minimum wage). Sigh...
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 2, 2017 15:01:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 2, 2017 16:29:03 GMT
Trump Abandons Idea of Sending Terrorism Suspect to Guantánamo Another day, another attack by the media on the president for clicks. A couple of things here: Did we suddenly collectively forget all the times Obama spoke up on local police matters and put his thoughts out there? Because it seems to be that while they make a brief mention here of one incident they seem to be trying to imply this is really only an issue with Republican presidents. Why is it that some people seem more concerned with the president saying the guy should be executed, especially since he clearly should given his actions and definitive guilt. Why does anyone believe that this guy deserves any consideration and full due process? From my thinking due process has been satisfied. He was caught red handed in the act. There is no dispute. He freely and proudly admits to his actions and shows no regret or remorse. Why are we showing him any human courtesy or bothering to go for a full trial? Justice should be swift and brutal for this clown. I'm with Uesugi here. Publicly chop off his dick on live television in the courthouse square, wrap it in bacon, and then sodomize him with it until he chokes to death. Then cut off his head and place it on a pike street side with a little sign that says terrorist wanna be so people can gawk at the birds pecking at it and spit on it and put their used gum on it as they go about their business. Make sure we satellite broadcast to all the middle eastern countries just to double down.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 3, 2017 16:33:57 GMT
Despite what this Muslim woman says,De-radicalisation programs won't fix the problem. Just don't allow people from these Arab shitholes into your country to begin with. Japan does it the right way. Japan has the balls to say certain cultures are not compatible with each other.www.9news.com.au/national/2017/11/03/13/49/sulayman-khalid-terror-plot-sentencedThe mother of a Sydney terror plot ringleader has broken down as she told 9NEWS that her son's ordinary upbringing at Regents Park gave no hint of his jihadi ambitions. Four young men and a teenager who prepared for a terrorist act that involved killing police officers and targeting government buildings in Sydney have been jailed today. Sulayman Khalid, 22, Jibryl Almaouie, 24, and the teen previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to do acts in preparation for a terrorist act to advance "violent jihad" in late 2014. Khalid was sentenced to 22 years and six months with a non-parole period of 16 years and nine months. "He was just a normal, beautiful young boy. Very happy. Just a very humble, beautiful young boy," Domenica Biscotta, a mother of six, told 9NEWS. "Once he started to go there [the book store] I'm not going to lie, I did realise a change. Ms Biscotta is now calling for more support for de-radicalisation programs. "So this will not happen and continue happening and our youth won't end up in Supermax." Khalid's co-offenders Mohamed Almaouie, 22, and Farhad Said, 25, previously pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of knowingly making a document likely to facilitate a terrorist act. Justice Geoffrey Bellew said Khalid, “was corrupted by a dangerous, violent and perverted ideology to which he unequivocally subscribed, which he wore as a badge of honour, but which has no place in civilised society.” Supporters broke down in tears as Justice Geoffrey Bellew handed down their sentences in a NSW Supreme Court in Parramatta today. He made the one-fingered ISIS salute as he was led to the cells. Mohamed Almaouie was sentenced to nine years' jail with a non-parole period of six years and nine months. Said was jailed for nine years and six months with a non-parole period of seven years and one month.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 3, 2017 16:39:56 GMT
www.9news.com.au/national/2017/11/03/13/49/sulayman-khalid-terror-plot-sentencedThe mother of a Sydney terror plot ringleader has broken down as she told 9NEWS that her son's ordinary upbringing at Regents Park gave no hint of his jihadi ambitions. Four young men and a teenager who prepared for a terrorist act that involved killing police officers and targeting government buildings in Sydney have been jailed today. Sulayman Khalid, 22, Jibryl Almaouie, 24, and the teen previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to do acts in preparation for a terrorist act to advance "violent jihad" in late 2014. Khalid was sentenced to 22 years and six months with a non-parole period of 16 years and nine months. "He was just a normal, beautiful young boy. Very happy. Just a very humble, beautiful young boy," Domenica Biscotta, a mother of six, told 9NEWS. "Once he started to go there [the book store] I'm not going to lie, I did realise a change. Ms Biscotta is now calling for more support for de-radicalisation programs. "So this will not happen and continue happening and our youth won't end up in Supermax." Khalid's co-offenders Mohamed Almaouie, 22, and Farhad Said, 25, previously pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of knowingly making a document likely to facilitate a terrorist act. Justice Geoffrey Bellew said Khalid, “was corrupted by a dangerous, violent and perverted ideology to which he unequivocally subscribed, which he wore as a badge of honour, but which has no place in civilised society.” Supporters broke down in tears as Justice Geoffrey Bellew handed down their sentences in a NSW Supreme Court in Parramatta today. He made the one-fingered ISIS salute as he was led to the cells. Mohamed Almaouie was sentenced to nine years' jail with a non-parole period of six years and nine months. Said was jailed for nine years and six months with a non-parole period of seven years and one month. ---------------------------
What is the point of incarcerating them? What do they think that's going to accomplish? Prison is supposed to be about punishment and the ability to receive parole is about rehabilitation. So who thinks these guys are going to be rehabilitated? This is not an element of society that we should allow to continue to fester. Just kill them very brutally and publicly and be done with it. And mommy thinks the government should have a program for deradicalization? That's your job mom. The governments job is just to find these asshats and stop them.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 3, 2017 16:47:10 GMT
I think the better solution is to not allow people from these Arab shitholes into your country to begin with. De-radicalisation programs won't do much and are just an easy solution to a major problem.Japan does it the right way. Japan has the balls to say certain cultures are not compatible with each other.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 3, 2017 16:50:44 GMT
10 000 Thai people dead from Muslim extremist related attacks in the past 10 years.Even though it's mainly Malay separatists that are doing it,they receive a lot of assistance from Arabs and ISIS,and there's terrorist attacks/plots from Muslims(usually arabs)happening all the time. And this lady thinks de-radicalisation programs will fix this? Japan and Trump had the balls to say what many are too afraid to say,or won't admit.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 3, 2017 16:51:10 GMT
I think the better solution is to not allow people from these Arab shitholes into your country to begin with. De-radicalisation programs won't do much and are just an easy solution to a major problem.Japan does it the right way. Japan has the balls to say certain cultures are not compatible with each other. Well yeah that too. I don't think its an either or here. Immigration policies need to be a lot more strict across the board. And then when people like this are uncovered you go right on and give them the martyr status they so want for themselves.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Nov 3, 2017 17:04:30 GMT
Thank God the Muslim lady in this video left Australia. She is one of the Muslims in Australia who thinks Sharia law is compatible with Australian culture.There is NO separation of state and religion in Islam.I've lived in Malaysia for 3 months(which is supposed to be a secular Muslim majority country)because I had a Malay Muslim girlfriend,and I saw how the Islam department like to dictate things to both Muslims and Non-Muslims.I was also treated like a 2nd class citizen,and my Malay girlfriend asked me to go with her to the Islam department because she wanted me to hear them out,they told me muslims can only give charity to non-muslims,Islam is 'logic' and non-muslims are lower than Muslims,and they said the 911 attack was a good thing.
Sharia law says it's OK for Muslims to lie and deceive non-muslims until Muslims are strong enough to take over.If the Muslims feel so strongly about Sharia,they should migrate to Saudi Arabia where women are treated like a 2nd class citizen and sex toy.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Nov 3, 2017 17:06:34 GMT
Thank God the Muslim lady in this video left Australia. She is one of the Muslims in Australia who thinks Sharia law is compatible with Australian culture.There is NO separation of state and religion in Islam.She knows taqiyya,which means it's OK for Muslims to lie and deceive non-muslims/ until Muslims are strong enough to take over.If the Muslims feel so strongly about Sharia,they should migrate to Saudi Arabia and be treated like a 2nd class citizen and sex toy. Stupid people like this deserve what they get. The problem is making sure they don't drag the rest of us down with them.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 5, 2017 14:06:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Nov 5, 2017 14:09:50 GMT
Thank God the Muslim lady in this video left Australia. She is one of the Muslims in Australia who thinks Sharia law is compatible with Australian culture.There is NO separation of state and religion in Islam.I've lived in Malaysia for 3 months(which is supposed to be a secular Muslim majority country)because I had a Malay Muslim girlfriend,and I saw how the Islam department like to dictate things to both Muslims and Non-Muslims.I was also treated like a 2nd class citizen,and my Malay girlfriend asked me to go with her to the Islam department because she wanted me to hear them out,they told me muslims can only give charity to non-muslims,Islam is 'logic' and non-muslims are lower than Muslims,and they said the 911 attack was a good thing. Sharia law says it's OK for Muslims to lie and deceive non-muslims until Muslims are strong enough to take over.If the Muslims feel so strongly about Sharia,they should migrate to Saudi Arabia where women are treated like a 2nd class citizen and sex toy. TTW;CS (Tried To Watch; Couldn't Stand)
|
|