|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Mar 7, 2018 17:38:24 GMT
BOOM! Science, y'all. A study was conducted with male and female volunteers. They were to meet a random member of the opposite sex and ask them if they would have sex with them. The females enjoyed a 75% success rate. The men? 0%.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Mar 7, 2018 18:00:05 GMT
BOOM! Science, y'all. A study was conducted with male and female volunteers. They were to meet a random member of the opposite sex and ask them if they would have sex with them. The females enjoyed a 75% success rate. The men? 0%. I don't know that I agree entirely with the studies conclusion that this indicates that men are more willing to have sex and that women place limits on the activity so much as it indicates that men are more willing to accept a proposition from an assertive woman. It also hurts the conclusion somewhat from my perspective in that the questions asked to the strangers were not necessarily "Would you have sex with me?" but ranged from "Would you go out with me tonight?" "Would you come by my apartment tonight?" and "Would you go to bed with me tonight?" Only one of those explicitly indicates an acceptance of an offer for sex. From the male perspective... talking up strangers... especially when you know you're trying to lead straight into a request for sex... yeah that's a recipe for fail. When a woman says this sort of thing the man is going to see it as a proposition. An offer of sex. When a guy asks a woman this kind of question, especially a stranger she's never met who just approached her on the sidewalk, it's going to come off to her like he's just a douche. If anything it does show the differences in how men and women perceive things. Also DUH... single early 20 something guys getting approached by even moderately attractive women showing interest and offering sex... Now the real kick in the balls is that it was just an experiment and these guys basically just got Rick Rolled so these girls could get a class credit. As for the guys asking... well they just got to go and embarrass themselves to women.
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Mar 7, 2018 18:39:44 GMT
BOOM! Science, y'all. A study was conducted with male and female volunteers. They were to meet a random member of the opposite sex and ask them if they would have sex with them. The females enjoyed a 75% success rate. The men? 0%. I don't know that I agree entirely with the studies conclusion that this indicates that men are more willing to have sex and that women place limits on the activity so much as it indicates that men are more willing to accept a proposition from an assertive woman. It also hurts the conclusion somewhat from my perspective in that the questions asked to the strangers were not necessarily "Would you have sex with me?" but ranged from "Would you go out with me tonight?" "Would you come by my apartment tonight?" and "Would you go to bed with me tonight?" Only one of those explicitly indicates an acceptance of an offer for sex. From the male perspective... talking up strangers... especially when you know you're trying to lead straight into a request for sex... yeah that's a recipe for fail. When a woman says this sort of thing the man is going to see it as a proposition. An offer of sex. When a guy asks a woman this kind of question, especially a stranger she's never met who just approached her on the sidewalk, it's going to come off to her like he's just a douche. If anything it does show the differences in how men and women perceive things. Also DUH... single early 20 something guys getting approached by even moderately attractive women showing interest and offering sex... Now the real kick in the balls is that it was just an experiment and these guys basically just got Rick Rolled so these girls could get a class credit. As for the guys asking... well they just got to go and embarrass themselves to women. Scroll down and read the study a little more. They asked a series of questions; Will you go out with me? Will you come to my apartment? Will you go to bed with me? Women were much more receptive to dates (free food, yay!) but dropped into the single digits for come to my apartment and scored a big goose egg on sex with strangers. Ironically the number sets were reversed; men were most likely to agree to sex, then apartment, then date. Sad part is if they did the study again today the number would probably be about the same unless they did it on Tinder.... then it would be a sea change.
|
|
|
Post by endorbr on Mar 7, 2018 18:43:58 GMT
I don't know that I agree entirely with the studies conclusion that this indicates that men are more willing to have sex and that women place limits on the activity so much as it indicates that men are more willing to accept a proposition from an assertive woman. It also hurts the conclusion somewhat from my perspective in that the questions asked to the strangers were not necessarily "Would you have sex with me?" but ranged from "Would you go out with me tonight?" "Would you come by my apartment tonight?" and "Would you go to bed with me tonight?" Only one of those explicitly indicates an acceptance of an offer for sex. From the male perspective... talking up strangers... especially when you know you're trying to lead straight into a request for sex... yeah that's a recipe for fail. When a woman says this sort of thing the man is going to see it as a proposition. An offer of sex. When a guy asks a woman this kind of question, especially a stranger she's never met who just approached her on the sidewalk, it's going to come off to her like he's just a douche. If anything it does show the differences in how men and women perceive things. Also DUH... single early 20 something guys getting approached by even moderately attractive women showing interest and offering sex... Now the real kick in the balls is that it was just an experiment and these guys basically just got Rick Rolled so these girls could get a class credit. As for the guys asking... well they just got to go and embarrass themselves to women. Scroll down and read the study a little more. They asked a series of questions; Will you go out with me? Will you come to my apartment? Will you go to bed with me? Women were much more receptive to dates (free food, yay!) but dropped into the single digits for come to my apartment and scored a big goose egg on sex with strangers. Ironically the number sets were reversed; men were most likely to agree to sex, then apartment, then date. Sad part is if they did the study again today the number would probably be about the same unless they did it on Tinder.... then it would be a sea change. Okay I will remove that concern from my original response then. But you are probably 100% correct about Tinder. Which shows something ridiculous about the way women are willing to have sex with strangers. The purpose of sites like Tinder would indicate that so long as they don't have to talk with them face to face first to get the hook up then they're DTF. At least we expect men to likely say yes when its offered, but then that's because outside instances of rape, women hold all the power in whether or not sex happens in hetero relationships.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 8, 2018 1:31:33 GMT
BOOM! Science, y'all. A study was conducted with male and female volunteers. They were to meet a random member of the opposite sex and ask them if they would have sex with them. The females enjoyed a 75% success rate. The men? 0%. I think women like sex just as much as men, but society makes it easier for women to get sex. If a man wants sex, he will likely need to date a woman for a period of time, or pay for a hooker(which costs a fair bit of money). If a man wants to have a one night stand, his best bet is to go to a nightclub where there's lot of horny women. Surveys that were done showed most women would like a 2nd husband to use for having sex. So the main husband is the provider and the person she invests her feelings in, the 2nd husband would be a boy toy.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 8, 2018 2:29:03 GMT
As I've mentioned before,quantum mechanics states we could be anywhere in the universe, because quantum particles have no singular location. This is because they behave like waves, and the wave is distributed in a way it instantly appears in other places,faster than the speed of light.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 14, 2018 8:26:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Uesugi-dono on Mar 14, 2018 11:05:24 GMT
I heard this on the way in and my heart sank. What a sad day for humanity.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 15, 2018 15:49:30 GMT
Plants harvest light with near 100% efficiency through quantum superposition. Photosynthetic Core Complex relies on photons using every possible route to reach the Photosynthetic Core. Without superposition, the chances of a photon reaching the core without colliding with other particles would be the same as a blindfolded person trying to find their way through the forest without colliding into any trees.
Our human bodies exist because of superposition, which allows molecules and DNA to form, Without superposition, the intricate structures of water,vegetation,stars and planets would likely not exist. Quantum wave function means all events happen, and we are everywhere in the universe right now, just more likely to be in certain places. Superposition is when something is observed, and the wave function for other possibilities is collapsed, so in a sense, what we observe becomes what we define as reality.
Wave function means it's possible we could go through a wall, or travel faster than light, because quantum particles can appear anywhere randomly, so there is the tiniest of chances we could fall through the Earth or instantly appear somewhere else in the universe. Perhaps this could be a way of explaining what happened to some of those missing people? Being able to instantly appear somewhere else is a way of getting around the speed of light limit.
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 19, 2018 8:57:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 22, 2018 0:55:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Mar 23, 2018 13:48:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Apr 1, 2018 23:58:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Apr 2, 2018 4:15:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TidusandYuna1983 on Apr 10, 2018 7:44:27 GMT
|
|